Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Research Proposal - The Impact of Violence-Themed Games on the Console Video Game Economy

UK Essay Writing Service - We accept all subjects. Just send us your instructions. Only £10 per page. www.mywritingassistant.com

Hong Kong Essay Writing Service - We accept all subjects. Just send us your instructions. Only HK$117 per page. www.mywritingassistant.com

Singapore Essay Writing Service - We accept all subjects. Just send us your instruction. Only SG$19.32 per page. www.mywritingassistant.com.


The Impact of Violence-Themed Games on the Console Video Game Economy

It can be said that the console video game industry has improved dramatically since its introduction in the commercial market in the 1970s (Herman et al, 2004). As technology develops, games become more realistic and attract more and more people. Records show that video games sales have improved over the years. In 1972, Magnavox created the first home video game called the Odyssey – a console with a low-bit video tennis game (Herman et al, 2004). Then it was followed Atari in the same year (the company that popularize the video game “Pong”) and the list of development for the industry goes on and on with the emergence of companies like Nintendo, NEC and SEGA. The graphics developed slowly into more sophisticated visual feats. The 8-bit graphics were replaced by a more colorful 16-bit. Then, the games developed to 32-bit graphic, to 64-bit, to 182-bit and now to a more graphic DVD supported games (Herman et al, 2004), which basically makes the visual experience of players become more realistic. The issue of violence in video games and how it influences people came from the improvement of graphics but not from the themes of the games. With the release of games like Mortal Kombat and Nightrap in 1993, Senators Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and Herbert Kohl of Wisconsin launch a Senate "investigation" into video game violence; threaten to somehow affect a ban on "violent" games (Herman et al, 2004). However, their demand of banning violent video games was somehow demoted into establishing a regulatory board for video games. In 1994, “The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) was established to rate video games” (Herman et al, 2004). The board uses large letter icons that appear on game boxes to let consumers know the recommended age of players for each game and whether the game is violent.

In 1975, the factory sales of video games only reached $22 million. Its estimated sales in 1981 were $1.2 billion. From early to late 80s, the highest sales of video games reached only $3 billion. However, by the end of 1992, video games sales reached nearly $4.9 billion (McConville, 1992).  In 1998, the U.S. retail sales of console video game software and hardware totaled $4.96 billion (PC Data, 1998). This increased over the succeeding years, but with inconsistencies. For instance, annual 2004 U.S. retail sales of video games, which include portable and console hardware, software and accessories, saw sales of over $9.9 billion. This was lower than one percent when compared to $10 billion in Annual 2003 (NPD Group, 2005).
           
Looking from its past, the video game industry shortly boomed in 1981, and then in 1982, sales fell precipitously that almost ended the whole industry. Fortunately, Nintendo’s introduction of the home-based video games gave light to the industry once more. One of the most instrumental in the revival of video games in the 80s was Nintendo’s Super Mario Bros. In 1985, Nintendo earned over $40 million from the game (GameCubicle.com, 2005). During those times, there were no issues about how video games promote violence. Then In 1992, Mortal Kombat was introduced and had $275 million sales. In 2002, the release of Grand Theft Auto games for the PlayStation 2 broke all records of video games sales. GTA III grossed almost $400 million. GTA Vice City equaled this record, and the newest GTA San Andreas is still selling strong.

The question is do violent games play a strong role in the growth of the video games industry? In the past, sales of video games were low and incidentally, there were still no violent games running in 128-bit graphics. It is obvious that with the growth of the video games industry, there is also an increase in violent games. It can also be seen that violent games perform well in terms of sales, which can be linked with the strong growth of the video games industry.

Aside from the issue of how violent games influences people, the researcher sees the issue of how violent games contribute to the video games industry. According to the Interactive Digital Software Association (2001), about 145 million people, or 60% of Americans, play video games and the average age of the players is 28 and 43% are women. This statistics show some of hint on why the top-selling games are violence themed. There are more sides of the story that needs further investigation to determine the real impact of violence on the sales of video games. Basically, there is a need to determine first what violence is and how the players define violence in the video games context. There is also a need to determine on why they enjoy playing such games. In the past, games are also violence-themed but lacked emphasis on graphics. Today, the graphics show realistic violence. Does this improvement have any relationship with the increasing sales of video games? These are just of some of the questions that are needed to be explored.

Comparison of Media Violence Histories


Violence in media did not start in video games. One of its early proponents and still ongoing is television. Television started and introduced in America in 1939 (Bushman and Anderson, 2001). Television broadcasting was suspended during the period of World War II but resumed in 1947 (Bushman and Anderson, 2001). Started in the 1950s, the percentage of television owners in America grown from 9% in 1950 to 98% in 1985 (Bushman and Anderson, 2001). Today, almost all households have television. This shows the strong appeal of television and its potential market source characteristic.

Admittedly, it can be observed that one of the reasons why television programs sell is because of its violent contents. However, it can be easily understood that violence has been a part of entertainment for centuries. This can be traced as early as the Ancient Greek civilization where it is common in plays to show violence or violent storylines. Furthermore, a more popular example of signs of violence in entertainment the past are the Gladiatorial tournaments produced by the Holy Roman Empire. Perhaps these shows can be considered as the father of reality shows. However, the themes are all about killing and mutilation in public. Coleman (2003) from BBC History depicts: “Exotic animals might be displayed and hunted in the early part of the programme, and prisoners might be executed, by exposure to the beasts”. Coleman (2003) also added: “The thirst for thrills even resulted in a particular rarity, female gladiators”. Violence can also be reflected in medieval plays such as that of Shakespear, particularly Macbeth, where the head of Macbeth is necessary to be shown on stage. These shards of history obviously shows that violence sells and has been an integral part of entertainment ever since the beginning of civilization.

            In the modern entertainment industry, violence started in the cinema. The first movie to tell an organized story “The Great Train Robber” in 1908 shows a large close-up of a cowboy firing his pistol directly at the camera (Bushman and Anderson, 2001).  Laughably, the first audiences who saw the film reacted by running out of the theater screaming (Bushman and Anderson, 2001). Research reports published in the early 1970’s stated that by age 14, the average child had witnessed more than 11,000 murders on television (Looney, 1971). This figure increased, with more recent reports stating that the average American child now witnesses about 10,000 violent crimes (e.g., murder, rape, and assault) per year on television- about 200,000 total violent crimes by the time they are teens (Signorielli et al, 1995). Moreover, the authors of the NTVS (1998) reported that 61% of television programs contain violence. Other reports contend that the figure for prime time network programs is more than 70% (Gerbner et al,1994). Violent acts occur 5 times per hour in primetime programs and 20 times per hour in children’s programs (Strasburger, and Wilson, 2002).The report of the National Television Violence Study (1996, 1997, 1998) also shows the high rate of TV violence consumption in America. Their analysis showed that in more than 8,000 hours of programming on cable and broadcast television in the United States, about 60% of TV programs contained violence. This is another indication that violence sells. In addition, Video Freedom (2002) stated that “5 violent acts per hour occur during prime time and 20-25 violent acts occur during Saturday morning children's programming”. In 2003-2004, the highest rating television show in the U.S. is CSI, which is also violence oriented (National People Meter Sample, 2004). Moreover, Vos Post (1995) found in his research that violence prevails in eight out of every ten programs. This indicates that producers are willing to invest in violent programs for some reasons. In 2002, depictions of violence were 41% more frequent during the 8:00 p.m. (ET/PT) Family Hour, and 134.4% more frequent during the 9:00 p.m. (ET/PT) hour than in 1998 (Parental Television Council, 2003). Another report shows that violent acts occur 5 times per hour in primetime programs and 20 times per hour in children’s programs (Strasburger, and Wilson, 2002).

            Violence sells in television. This can be reflected in certain studies. For instance, Hamilton (1998) found in a large survey consists of adults in three age categories (18-34, 35-50, and 50+) that 73% of men in the 18-34 group were heavy consumers of violent programming and that overall, men in this age category answered yes to an average of almost 5 out of 10 questions related to viewing violent shows. Furthermore, the next highest-viewing group was women in the 18-34 age groups, 60% of whom were considered profound consumers of televised violence.

Grobel (2001) enumerated several reasons why violence sells in television. Reasons include: violent media are successful in part because violence attracts the attention of male adolescents, a highly sought after demographic for marketers; it easier to produce and has a more universal language than complex, dialogue-based stories; and its scenes essentially speak for themselves, needing very little in the way of verbal translation.

            Basically, the rationale being presented here is that while violence is widely used in television as can be seen on several accounts of history, the same formula is being applied in video games. Almost all video games are violence-based which are similar with television or movie violence. The profit acquired by violent video games can be associated with the success of violence in television, which suggests that it is indeed an easy ticket to gain sales. It has been tested as effective in television. People are really buying violence, which gives a rather awkward title of being an essential factor in marketing entertainment. The birth of violence in television created genres of shows that are violent oriented, which some have achieved cult status. This is the main foundation of video games as their only difference in television entertainment is that they are interactive and can be controlled. The sales of the Grand Theft Auto series, the Resident Evil series, and other violent video games reflect and identify with the ratings of shows such as CSI, NYPD Blues, and other popular shows that depict violence in the most obvious or subtlest form. However, the role of violence in the sales of entertainment media still needs further investigation. This should be carefully approached as it enters into the moral grounds, particularly the question on whether or not it is justifiable to use violent content for profit purposes.

Research Question

            To further explain the problem being presented, the following research questions have been formed:

1.         Does the trend of violence in games can be rooted from the strong foundation of violence in television?
2.         Does the ratings or profit acquired by producers of violent television programs similar with the profits acquired by video game developers that develop violent video games?
3.         Are the graphics of video games important to consumers and do they want it to become as realistic with the violent shows they watch on televisions or films?
4.         Is the emergence of violent video games resulted from the decades of promotion of violent shows in television and cinema?

Conclusion


            Both television shows and video games are vehicles for violent entertainment. It is perceived that violence is an essential factor for the success of TV and video game productions. The investigation on the role of violence in entertainment sales may create new media theories, particularly the link between the evolution of violence in both graphics and plot in video games, and the established violence in television.






















References:
Bushman, B.J. and Anderson, A.C. (2001). Media Violence and the
American Public: Scientific Facts versus Media Misinformation, American Psychologist, Vol. 56. No.6/7; pp.477-489

Clements, M.T. and Ohashi, H. (2004). Indirect Network Effects and Product Cycle: Video Games in the U.S. 1994-2002. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia and Department of Economics, University of Tokyo.

Coleman , K. (2003). Gladiators: Heroes of the Roman Amphitheatre (online). Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/gladiators_05.shtml [Accessed: 04/02/05].


Cornell Equity Research (1998). Midway Games (online). Available at: http://parkercenter.johnson.cornell.edu/docs/other_research/1998_spring/mwy.pdf [Accessed: 03/07/05].

GameCubicle.com (2005). Nintendo Sales (online). Available at:] http://www.gamecubicle.com/features-mario-units_sold_sales.htm [Accessed: 03/10/05

GameWatcher (2005). Mortal Kombat Sales (online). Available at:
http://www.allcube.com/gamewatcher/news/mkhistory.asp [Accessed: 03/10/05].

Groebel, J. (2001). Media Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective.  In D.G. Singer & J.L. Singer (Eds.)  Handbook of Children and the Media.  Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.

Hamilton, J. T. (1998). Channeling violence: The economic market for violent television programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Harmetz, A. (1982). Home Video Games Nearing Profitability of the Film Business; Home Video Games Nearing Profitability of Films. The New York Times. New York Times New York, N.Y.: Oct 4, 1982. p. A1

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Herman, L., Horwitz, J., Kent, S. and Miller, S. (2004). History of Video Games
(online). Available at: http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/video/hov/index.html [Accessed: 07/20/04].
Ikuine, F. (1996). The Home-Video Game Industry: 1983-1996 – Competitive Strategy Revolving Around Industry Standards. University of Tokyo.
Interactive Digital Software Association (2001). Video Games and Youth Violence: Examining the Facts. Washington DC, US.
Looney, G. (1971). Television and the child: What can be done? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Chicago, IL.

McConville, J.A. (1992). Game Sales Should Exceed '92 Expectations. (1992 Video Games Sales). HFD-The Weekly Home Furnishings Newspaper, Issue 96. 

NPD Group (2005). The NPD Group Reports Annual 2004 U.S. Video Game Industry Retail Sales (online). Available at: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/050118/185981_1.html [Accessed: 03/07/05].

PC Data (1998). PC Data Releases 1998 Video Game Statistics; Fourth Quarter 1998 Software Sales Soar 44 Percent, Console Sales Level Off (online). Available at:http://www.pcdata.com [Accessed: 03/07/05].

Pollack, A. (1982). Newcomers Crowd Field; Video Game Sales War. The New York Times. New York Times. New York, N.Y.: Jun 9, 1982. p. D1

RocResearch (2004, 2005). Video Game Industry. London, UK.

Signorielli, N., Gerbner, G., and Morgan, M. (1995). Violence on television: The cultural indicators project. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Vol.39, No.1; pp.278-283

Strasburger, V. C., and Wilson, B. J. (2002).  Children, adolescents, and the mediaThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Vos Post, J. (1998). Open Questions on the Correlation Between Television and Violence. Magic Dragon Multimedia (online). Available at: http://www.magicdragon.com/EmeraldCity/Nonfiction/socphil.html [Accessed: 04/02/05].


Wark, A. (1976). BUSINESS ROUNDUP; Boom and Bust in Video Games? New York Times. New York, N.Y.: Dec 12, 1976. p. F17